In
theory, a Muslim is a believer in the fundamental Islamic precepts brought to
the world in the seventh century by Allah. So what produces a peace-loving
Muslim, versus a violent one?
By Shira Sorko-Ram MAOZ, PO Box 535788 Grand Prairie TX 75053 www.MaozIsrael.org |
True Christians understand the description
of a devout follower of Yeshua - a person who loves and studies the word of
God, and endeavors to live each day of his life as a disciple of the one and
only True God.
On the other hand, a nominal Christian who
may call himself a Christian, but knows little of the word of God and does not
follow the commandments of Yeshua is the norm today in western civilization. At
funerals, nominal Christians speak of their loved ones who are now in heaven,
but on earth these people live as any other non-believer. The center of their
universe is not God.
So it is with Islam. Many Muslims are not
really interested in being “religious.” They know they were born a Muslim, and
revere Islam, but know little of the precepts of their faith, don’t go to the
mosque, don’t pray five times a day, don’t look forward to a “haj” - a
once-in-a-lifetime religious sojourn (pilgrimage) to Mecca.
On the other hand, a devout follower of
Mohammed, a person who loves and studies the Koran and other Islamic holy
books, endeavors to live each day of his life as a disciple of the “one and
only true god, Allah.”
Born-again, devout Christians are often
called “fundamentalists.” ... Many Christians like to explain that their faith
is based on “original Christianity” which in turn is based on “early Christian”
belief based on the Old and New Testaments.
In a way, the same adjectives apply to
devout Muslims. Instead of the misnomer “radicalized,” these Muslims are fundamentalists.
Their belief system is based on “mainstream Islam” because they are following
“original Islam” based on “early Islamic” belief of the three pillars of Islam,
the Koran, the Hadith (stories about Mohammed) and the Sira
(biographies of Mohammed).
The difference between the two faiths is
that the closer a Christian or a Messianic Jew is in a personal relationship
with God and His Son, Yeshua, the more he or she studies and practices the Word
of God, the more like the Messiah of Israel this person becomes. Through the Holy
Spirit, the Christian aims to exude these qualities: love, joy, peace,
longsuffering, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control.
Because of the incredible role-model of Yeshua who gave His life for us, the
true Christian/ Messianic aims to be a giver and a blessing to his world.
On the other hand, the more devout a Muslim,
the more he adopts the lifestyle of his role-model Mohammed and studies and
practices the chief doctrines laid out in the written words of Islam. Some of
the most important laws of Islam are:
1. The penalty for leaving Islam is death. Freedom of
religion is not an option with Islam.
2. Human rights for women are all but non-existent.
3. The goal of Allah and all true Muslims must be to
conquer all nations and create a global caliphate (a world super nation - under
Islamic control).
4. Sharia will be the law for all human beings.
5. The sword is to be used, if necessary, to reach
this goal.
6. Every Muslim is obligated to spread Islam. Devious
methods are obligatory when necessary. These tactics are particularly suitable
to the methods of the Muslim Brotherhood.
7. Although there is no promise in Islam that a
Muslim will be selected to go to heaven, there is one exception: If a Muslim becomes
a martyr while fighting for Islam, he is guaranteed a place in heaven, with the
well-known hope of 72 virgins at his service, and “eternal virginity” for women
martyrs.
8. The Jihadist is stimulated in this world by the
knowledge that women he captures in war are his sex slaves. (Part of the great attraction
of ISIS.)
9. Christians and Jews must convert to Islam, pay a
tax or be killed. No new buildings of any other religions can be built.
The
Muslims-in-name-only cannot successfully argue against these Islamic standards
because it’s all written down in clear and forceful language in the books they
supposedly believe are sacred.
But
the raging question among westerners is just how many fundamentalist Muslims
are there? The usual figure given is about 15%. Out of 1.6 billion, that’s
about 240,000,000 Muslims who are bent on conquering the world.
But then, 85% of all Muslims are thought to
be peace-loving people. That’s the usual benchmark given by experts and only
some 15% are considered died-in-the-wool Jihadists.
But the percentage of “nominal” Muslims
worldwide who say they desire Sharia law is actually much higher. Among the
Palestinian population, 89% want Sharia (Islamic) law according to a Pew
poll. No wonder an
11-year-old Palestinian child who grabbed a knife and seriously wounded an
11-year-old Jewish boy on a bike told the police, “I wanted to be a martyr.”
In Europe, according to the Pew poll, 13%
of Muslims believe that Muslims who convert to Christianity should be executed.
In South Asia, 76% believe the same way.
The Islamic university, Al Azhar in Cairo,
Egypt, is considered by Sunni Muslims the most prestigious university in the
world. It has 450,000 students and 9,000 schools. Within this university, there
rages great controversy over the above violent laws.
Sheikh Muhammad Abdullah Nasr is a scholar
of Islamic law and graduate of Egypt’s Al Azhar. When asked why Al Azhar, which
regularly denounces secular thinkers as un-Islamic, refused to denounce the
Islamic State (ISIS), Sheikh Nasr explained,
"The Islamic State is a byproduct of
Al Azhar’s programs. So can Al Azhar denounce itself as un-Islamic? Al Azhar
says there must be a caliphate and that it is an obligation for the Muslim
world [to establish it]. Al Azhar teaches the law of apostasy and killing the
apostate. Al Azhar is hostile towards religious minorities, and teaches things
like not building churches, etc…Al Azhar teaches stoning people. So can Al
Azhar denounce itself as un-Islamic?"
One press report spoke of the similarity between
ISIS thought and Al-Azhar University’s curriculum, which “allows for killing a
Muslim who does not pray, one who leaves Islam…gouging their eyes and chopping
off their hands and feet, as well as banning the construction of churches…”
A sermon delivered by popular Saudi Sheikh
Muhammad Salih al-Munajjid clearly demonstrates why Western secular relativists
and multiculturalists - who currently dominate media, academia, and politics -
are incapable of understanding, much less responding to, the logic of Islamic
intolerance. Journalist Raymond Ibrahim explains the thinking of the Saudi
Sheikh:
“Some [Muslim] hypocrites wonder why it is
that '[Muslims] don’t permit them [Christians] to build churches, even though
they allow mosques to be built.' Any Muslim who thinks this way is “ignorant”
and wants to equate between right and wrong, between Islam and kufr
[non-Islam]…and gives to each side equal weight, and wants to compare this with
that, and he asks: 'Why don’t we build them churches like they build us
mosques? So we allow them this in return for that?' Do you want another other
than Allah to be worshiped? Do you equate between right and wrong?... And
Prophet Muhammad said: 'By Him in whose hand is the life of Muhammad (By Allah)
he who among the Jews or Christians hears about me, but does not affirm his
belief in that which I have been sent, and dies in his state (of disbelief), he
shall be of the residents of Hellfire."
If, as Munajjid points out, a Muslim truly
believes that Islam is the only true religion, and that Muhammad is its
prophet, why would he allow that which is false (and thus corrupt, cancerous,
misleading, etc.) to exist alongside it? Such gestures of 'tolerance' would be
tantamount to a Muslim who 'wants to equate between right and wrong,' as the
sheikh correctly deplores."
It is true that the President of Egypt
Abdel Fattah al-Sissi has made a call for reforming Islam. And there are voices
within Islam that are taking up his cry for a religious revolution. Al-Sissi
has gone further to protect Christians in Egypt than any other recent ruler.
But he has a tremendous uphill challenge. Primarily, he must avoid assassination
by Jihadists who believe he has made himself an apostate to Islam.
Al Azhar University in Egypt of course has
different theological movements within its walls. There are voices within Al
Azhar trying to remove from textbooks such subjects as sex slaves and the
spoils of war, saying they were applicable during the Muslim conquests but are
now considered out of date. They are insisting that students should not read
old religious texts without guidance. On the other end are the Salafists [considered
the strongest “fundamentalists” or followers of original Islam] who are fighting
reform with all their might. They claim that the “reformers” within Islam “are
seeking to destroy the university’s important role in protecting Egypt.”
In short, the phenomenon known as “ISIS” is
not a temporal aberration within Islam but rather a byproduct of what is
considered normative thinking for Al Azhar - the Islamic world’s most authoritative
university.
Many western military experts, not impeded
by political correctness, say the West could easily defeat ISIS. Islamic expert
Daniel Pipes says, “It’s a little bug that the powers could quash at will if
they put their minds to it.”
But mainstream fundamentalist Islam among
1.6 billion people is the evil weapon that no human force can defeat. There are
hundreds of fundamentalist Islamic groups who are fighting for a worldwide
caliphate. When ISIS is defeated, if it is, many other mainstream Islamist movements
will continue to rise up out of the womb of original Islam.
From the book of Revelation, where it
speaks of multitudes of believers in heaven that were beheaded, it appears that
worldwide Islam will continue to grow until the Lord himself with His two-edged
sword smites the evil one. However, there is no doubt in my mind that there is
power now in the universe that can stop Islam today in specific local areas.
God’s people must wage a war in the Spirit and cast down the evil forces that
are bent on taking our neighborhoods, our towns, our states and our nations.